Sunday 23 March 2014

Week 3 : Organisational learning and academic leadership

With reference to Senge’s 5 disciplines - to what extent is your organisation a Learning Organisation?
Personal Mastery
Senge said that an organization will never start a learning process if persons in that organization does not start learned. We must define our target that we want to achieve and how far we want to go with it. Therefore, each person must have their own vision to be a responsible, motivated and determinant with their job.
In my organization, each school must have their own vision and target. The involvement of each department in setting a clear mission and vision is very important to each institution from the beginning.
Shared Vision
This focus on the mutual purpose. People with common purpose can learn to nourish a sense of commitment in an organization by developing shared images of the future they seek to create and the strategies, principles and guiding practices by which they hope to get there.
The idea and concept in the vision of an organization more efficient to achieve the result if sharing of information and inspiration happen between the top management and subordinates. This was clarified in the proposal given by (Tan and Higgins, 2002).
In my organization, this part is not been fully implement. We do have our sharing session to set and discuss the vision but the main vision come from the top management. All institution/school must make sure the vision will be accomplished no matter what happen.
Mental Models
This discipline will determine how we think and act. It focused around developing awareness of attitudes and perceptions for our own and those of others around us.
In my organization, they have this model but not been develop among the subordinate at all level. Even though there are some effort to give a briefing, discussion and training to promote this model, the implementation still at the minimum level. Top management always try to make sure each person at all level will implement this model through special programs that been organised and there will be introduction for new programs / workshop to enhance people to use this model.
Team Learning
(Senge, 1990) give a definition as a process to coordinate and develop the capability to achieve the result that the group had been set earlier.
This is a discipline of group interaction where a small groups of people (expertise) transform their collective thinking, learning to mobilize their energies to achieve their goal.
In our organization, this process had been the most popular activity. Every level have they own team to perform and achieve their goal. (Teachers, non-academic staff, student)
Systems Thinking
This system can improve learning process by focusing on the whole system. People learn to better understand interdependency and change and thereby are able to deal more effectively with the forces that shape the consequences of their actions.
In my organization, we always been remind to use this discipline in any process that we going through to achieve the standard quality that been set up. However, there will be a certain level/subordinate did not really on to it. Mentoring take part in this matter to ensure the standard of the quality.

Fullan, Framework for leadership: What can we learn from this framework?
  • To be an effective leader, we must have some special characteristic to tackle people around us. The first component that should be taken placed is the moral purposed which must be involve in the process and at the end product as well.  Moral purpose should have a purpose and a passion. Leaders also must understand the change process & the complexity involved in change. Leadership must re-culture the organization during the change process. People will work towards a higher goal if they see the purpose of the change and if it makes sense to them.
  • The second most important component that will give the biggest impact to the leadership environment and lead to a successful change initiative is the relationship building. Managing human resource is different from machine or any other creatures in this world because human is the most special and complex creature.  There must be a sense of belonging to the project to get their commitment involved. According to Steele (2008) trust between the leadership and the other members is one of the most important relationships that can occur. ‘It is the interactions and relationships among people, not the people themselves that makes the difference in an organizational success” (Fullan). Leaders must create learning communities that enhance the skills and knowledge of the people in the organization.
  • The culture of the organization and sharing information will create a harmony cycle between these two processes towards organization. Organizations that create and share knowledge are characterized by the ability to sharing tacit and explicit information, sharing the same beliefs, create professional development opportunities and communicate both up and down in the hierarchy.
  • Coherence Making is the final step of understanding the change. Once people start to make meaning of the change and it has coherence, new patterns may emerge. When the changes are perceived positively it creates energy, enthusiasm and generates other positive changes.
What are the implications in our workplace?
Once people start to make meaning of the change and it has coherence, new patterns may emerge. Then it will creates energy, enthusiasm and generates other positive changes. New ideas will come out and leadership will be developed at all levels of the organization, and new leaders cultivated for the future. Any changes that will be made will succeed if these framework been applied in any organization that try to making any changes in the organization.

 Sharing page :

Week 2 : Governance, Management and Practice of Higher Education


Development of Higher Education in Malaysia
In my opinion, Malaysia succeed in democratizing higher education and produce the number of graduates to meet the manpower requirement economic growth. It start with the first higher education institute, the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur on 1st January 1962. Followed by Institute Teknologi MARA on 14 October 1967, Universiti Sains Malaysia (1969), Universiti Kebangsaan (1970). Universiti Pertanian (1971) & Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (1975) then it became 20 public university now in Malaysia. Besides public universities, Malaysia also have more than 500 high institution in our higher educational system. In 1996, the National Council on Higher Education was established.
Issues in quality of Higher Education in Malaysia
Quality being the most important issues in our country. The establishment of the Ministry of Education (MOE) in 2004 is a government support mechanism for the development of local universities.
The Malaysian government regards the issue of standardisation of accreditation as a necessary condition for international higher education (Morshidi and Sarjit 2007). In early 2007, Malaysia Qualifications Framework (MQF) had been approved by parliamentary and in November 2007, Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA) have been established as a small steps for Malaysia in terms of raising the overall quality of higher education in line with development at the international level.  All public universities or private sector aiming to be 'World Class University' as the measure of quality of their institutions.
The second issue that give a big concern for Malaysia is the higher education framework that prepares graduates for an interconnected world and a highly globalised economy.
In order to be an important focal point in the global network, we needs to prepare global-ready graduates for a workforce that requires inter- and multi-cultural competencies, which will ensure success in dealing with problems and threats that have come about from the advance of globalisation. This “global workforce development” initiatives (Bremer 2006) could be realised through changes in the priorities and objectives of higher educational institutions in Malaysia. Human capital includes not only the contributions that educated graduates make to the economy, but also the non-monetary benefits they contribute to society through improved parenting, healthier lifestyles, greater civic participation, and increased social cohesion (Haveman, Bershadker, and Schwabish 2003).
Other issue that had been taken placed is ‘Internationalization versus Globalization in Higher Education’. Internationalization of higher education is no longer merely desirable; it is a necessity. It is one of the ways a country responds to the impact of globalization yet, at the same time respects the individuality of the nation.  (Knight, 1997). Internationalization of higher education is the process of integrating international dimension into the teaching, research, and public service function of the institution.
Summary
Through my observation and what i have learned and discussed before this with my teachers, there are some issues in Higher Education that always been emphasized by the academicians in my country.  

Quality of higher education
·         The increasement in the number of university
·         The MQF and MQA
·         Placement in the list rank of 'World Class University'

Quality of graduates
·         The increasement of student numbers
·         Students’ performance
·         Factors affecting student achievement

Teaching Method
·         Teaching & learning facilities
·         Mode of delivery
·         Teaching or researching

In the process to develop the world of higher education, there are many challenges and critical issues have to be faced. However, if we put and manipulate it in the right place, these challenges and issues can be used as a moral boost to improve the quality and credibility of an institution of higher learning.
Reference :

1. Muniapan, Balakrishnan, ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION IN MALAYSIA, Curtin University of Technology,  Miri, Sarawak

2. Ministry of Higher Education.

3. Minister Of Education, Malaysia – Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025

4. Malaysian Qualification Agency www.mqa.gov.my

5. Sirat,Morshidi (2009).Trends in International Higher Education and Regionalism:  Issues and Challenges for Malaysia 




Monday 17 March 2014

Introduction

My name is Mushala Ahmad from Malaysia. I am a Malaysian Government servant and has been awarded scholarship to pursue my studies by Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) a Malaysian Government Agency. This is my first semester in Masters of Educational Leadership and also my first time being here at Australia.
I had been working as a mathematics teacher in secondary school since 2001 organized by MARA. In 2009 I had been given responsibility to be head of mathematics department until early June 2013 before got transferred to another school as Deputy Principal of Academic Affairs. In my position, I had to get involved in planning, organizing, coaching, mentoring & managing teachers' programs & students performance as well. I also had to monitoring students' achievement in academic, planning with my team to schedule students' programs through out a year to achieve the best result in academic and in their lives as well and get the best rank among the schools. Now we are trying to focus on developing leaders for our future.
I also had a responsibility to enhance teachers, support and motivate them to upgrade their skills and try to meet teachers and staffs needs especially about their recognition, appraisal and also physically needs. I need some knowledge to manage all these. I believe that from this course, it will help me on my vision to support teachers performance in order to improve quality & teaching quality skills and to lead them to be a leader.
I also choose this course as it give me a bigger perspective for me as a leader and to understand more about issues and concepts of Higher Education. This will give me more chances to get involved in Higher Education for my future profession. After I complete my study here, MARA will assign me to a new position and maybe I will get involved in HE so, definitely I don't want to miss this course.